Darwinism at its worst does not promote or endorse genocide… there is nothing natural about extermination of a race or ethnicity… it makes more sense to invoke selective breeding as a causal effect in these cases, and selective breeding has been practiced for millenia, long before Darwin was ever born.

Your misconception is a perfect illustration of why literal creationists make SUCH BAD SCIENTISTS. You infuse everything with intent, whereas a rational scientist does not look at evolution and read intent or higher purpose into it (and therefore does not extract any kind of moral framework from the fact that is evolution).

I’ll grant you that evolution can be twisted to support racism, but just barely since we humans are in fact just one species. Even if this is the case, does the fact that bad people might choose to misinterpret and misuse such information make it less true? No.

We evolved, copious empirical evidence supports this, deal with it. Better to deal with the truth than deal with nut-jobs trying to argue that blacks and Jews are descended from “mud people” or the sons of Cain etc

And if you want to argue against the fact of evolution then I would first request that you tell me how all the land animals from the Ark could go from being functionally extinct to thriving populations again. And then talk about how the carnivores used to be herbivores before original sin, even though they had big pointy teeth. Forgive me if I don’t know exactly where you conveniently draw the line here between history and fairytale.

Science is all about evidence, you can hope all you like that we will find God’s signature in our DNA but until we do you need to chill and accept that ID is just wishful thinking from people who cannot stomach the idea of being wrong and think proper science is too hard.